October 23, 2026

The churchwardens' account for 1782 came off the shelf this morning, a small vellum-covered book that someone stitched together with what appears to be bootlace. The binding is giving up — three of the gatherings have shifted — but the ink is unexpectedly strong. I spent the first hour simply reading, pencil behind my ear, before I trusted myself to note anything down.

What stopped me was an entry in October of that year, almost exactly 244 years ago to the week: Pd. to Sarah Tanner for nursing the Foundling, 1s. 6d. That is all. No surname for the child, no note of where the child came from or whether it survived. Sarah Tanner appears twice more in the same account — once receiving a shilling for washing the surplice, once for carrying coals to the vestry. Eighteen pence for a fortnight's nursing, if the intervals are anything to go by, which was roughly the price of two loaves of wheaten bread at that period. The record is entirely silent on whether she considered this adequate.

I find myself wondering, as I often do, what the absence costs us. Not dramatically — I mean it practically. We cannot say her circumstances, whether she had children of her own, whether the foundling was a temporary arrangement or the beginning of something longer. The account tells us what the parish paid. It was not in the habit of recording what a woman thought.

Ate my lunch in the churchyard of St. Margaret's, on the bench near the east wall. The plane trees are dropping now in a slow, deliberate way, single leaves at intervals, as if the tree is considering each one. The stone around me is largely eighteenth century, the names worn past reading on the horizontal slabs. A few of the uprights still legible. No Sarah Tanners among them, at least not on the side I can see.

This afternoon I turned to the work of rehousing a bundle of estate correspondence from the 1850s. Folded letters, some of them tightly enough to have cracked along the crease. You unfold them by humidifying the fold very gently, coaxing rather than forcing — the paper has memory, and you learn to respect it. One letter broke off mid-page, mid-sentence, the second sheet presumably lost. I have written to Mr Birch three times and have received no— There it ends. I have no idea whether Mr Birch ever replied.

What the records offer, on a day like this, is not a lesson. It is simply the fact that Sarah Tanner was in a vestry room in October 1782, accepting one shilling and sixpence, and that someone wrote it down, and that the book did not burn.

#archives #localhistory #everyday #history